The brief outline of the case is that a researcher acting as a supervisor for a mastes thesis used some of the students work in a conference paper without referencing the work of the students. Apparently the students were mentioned in the oral presentation of the paper. Not that this matters.
May 2005: The conference when the paper was presented.
November 2005: The plagiarism is addressed by the Faculty, unsure what they actually did probably just decided to send the errand on to the ethics committee.
May 2006: A split ethics committee is not in agreement and send the case on to the National Science Council (Vetenskapsrådet)
March 2007: National Science Council reaches the conclusion that the researcher had behaved in an unethical manner by plagiarising student essays.
June 2007: The expert group at the Science council reach the same conclusion.
September 2007: The Human Resources Committee at Göteborg University is the body with the power to punish the researcher for her actions is unable to act since the university failed to notify the researcher, in writing, that disciplinary actions could be taken. This notification must take place within two years of the waking of the errand. This means that since nobody at the university bothered to notify the researcher in writing during the past two year no disciplinary actions can be taken.
This situation has been handled incredibly badly….