Book sale!

Columbia University Press are having a book sale – This is a great place to get those unnecessary impulse buys! I managed to find a list of books I didn’t know that I couldn’t live without:

Lesley A. Sharp: Bodies, Commodities, and Biotechnologies – $12.75
Jeff Hughes: The Manhattan Project – $10.75
Edward W. Said: Humanism and Democratic Criticism – $4.39
Richard Rorty and Pascal Engel: What’s the Use of Truth? – $2.59
Katherine Verdery: The Political Lives of Dead Bodies – $12.50
David Carroll: Albert Camus the Algerian – $11.25

Considering the fact that the dollar is low this is a really good price but it could be very expensive if I keep doing this…

Overcoming fear

Skipping away from deadline pressure for a little while. I was asked (actually it’s re-occurring question) why I like lecturing. Often the person asking is concerned about their own lecturing. OK I must admit I enjoy lecturing and, based upon responses, I think that I am good at giving lectures. I was not always comfortable lecturing, in particular at the beginning of my career when I was new to it. The trick is to get rid of fear – this quote, for me, captures the main way to do so:

By embracing the inescapable, I lost my fear of it. I’ll tell you a secret about fear: its an absolutist. With fear, its all or nothing. Either, like any bullying tyrant, it rules your life with a stupid blinding omnipotence, or else you overthrow it, and its power vanishes like a puff of smoke. And another secret: the revolution against fear, the engendering of that tawdry despots fall, has more or less nothing to do with ‘courage’. It is driven by something much more straightforward: the simple need to get on with your life.

Salman Rushdie – The Moors Last Sigh

Eva joins the blogosphere

A colleague, photographer and fellow flickr abuser has just joined the blogosphere and I am looking forward to seeing the blog grow. If it is anything like her photography it should be well worth following. Check out her work at Homespun and why not drop by her Flickr site.

 

 

Camera License

Not long ago in a recent awareness campaign the London police managed to link photography to terrorism.

1.jpg

This was silly enough and would only really have two effects – either it is ignored or it creates panic. But even worse is the example when a policeman asked a person taking photographs whether he has a license to do so…

The BBC reports that Phil Smith was taking pictures in a public place and was challenged by a police officer who asked if he had a licence for the camera.

After explaining he didn’t need one, he was taken down a side-street for a formal “stop and search”, then asked to delete the photos and ordered not take any more. So he slunk home with his camera.

Obviously the policeman was wrong but the considering the strange climate of fear and paranoia coupled with the official power of the police the potential for abuse is great indeed.

Aweful truth: The real cost of green

While much of the world suffers from lack of food, malnutrition and occasional starvation the rest of us seem not to have noticed. Via Monbiot I became aware of a terrible little fact:

The World Bank points out that “the grain required to fill the tank of a sports utility vehicle with ethanol … could feed one person for a year”   (World Bank, 2008. Biofuels: The Promise and the Risks)

Something worth sharing…

Parallel Production Sucks

Despite being totally aware of the consequences I am now stuck (again) with the job of writing several things in parallel. In the next two weeks I need to finish my open access report for Lund, two book chapters and a licensing booklet. The actual content is not the problem – what is the problem is despite all efforts to the contrary deadlines have a tendency to expand and contract to finally collect themselves in nasty little clusters that force the whole writing process into an attempt to beat text from the dead mind of the writer.

So how does this happen and can it be avoided? To answer the last question first: Of course it can be avoided. The simple trick is to only do one thing at a time. The cost of this approach will be to radically diminish my writing output. So this does not feel like an option.

The first question (why?) is more complex. It can be attributed to bad planning but this is only part of the truth. For many years I would explain my deadline stress with the words bad planning but I have come to realize that this is not the whole truth. No matter how good my planning is life has a way of throwing small surprises (not all pleasant) dates change, new tasks are assigned and often unrealistic work loads lead to delays.

The results of these insights should maybe be to attempt to change – but how can you change the unforeseen? How much planning must be included for that which you cannot know? And in the end isn’t it all a waste of time? After all:

Life is what happens to you while you’re busy making other plans – John Lennon

Travel Fraud & Plagiarism

Just because it’s plagiarism doesn’t mean that it has to be bad writing. A travel writer for Lonely Planet, my favorite travel series, has admitted to the Sunday Telegraph that he has not been in the countries he has written about. He wrote his book on Colombia from San Francisco and has admittedly never been in that country he has also admitted to plagiarising  large sections of the book.

The Lonely Planet has fact checked his books but discovered no faults in them.

So what is the problem with a travel writer who has never been in the country? Well it is dishonest and fraudulent since the premise is that the writer is writing from personal experience. The fact that it is good writing is not the point. In fact, as most students are aware, a prerequisite for good plagiarism is good writing.

Involuntary Detox

Warning this is just me venting my frustration….

Right. Entering my fourth week without broadband at home. Let me assure everyone this is not a voluntary state of affairs. It all began with me being silly enough to want to move to a better apartment. The move went very well but then the broadband company struck. For reasons which are not really clear to me the technician needs to talk to me. Unfortunately I had registered my old mobile number so I missed the call. Naturally this means that the technician could not call me again for the next two weeks. After several calls to my provider I now have a new date in the middle in this week for the installation of broadband. But this naturally depends on the call from the technician.

Three weeks without broadband has not improved my general mood or enabled me to develop a greater enjoyment of analog technologies. For those of you who think that you will read more if you had less access to broadband this theory – in my involuntary experiment – failed miserably. I read more when I have broadband.

Now I tend to collect lots of broadband related tasks and take them to work. Then attempt to remember what it was I was hoping to do when I had a decent internet connection. Bloody annoying. It’s not that I miss anything in particular it’s just the general basic luxury of having access to a technology upon which I depend heavily.

Storm Trooper Property Wars

George Lucas is the man behind the Star Wars films and as such he owns the rights to them. A lesser known fact is that Andrew Ainsworth was the costume designer behind the white stormtrooper helmets. So far so good each gets his due.

But who owns the designs for the stormtrooper costumes?

The British prop designer who created their famous white helmets and body armour is being sued by director George Lucas for £10m in a case starting at the high court tomorrow. Andrew Ainsworth was sued by the director’s company, Lucasfilm, after reproducing the outfits from the original moulds and selling them for up to £1,800 each. (The Force)

This would be fun in itself but the story gets even better:

Ainsworth is countersuing Lucasfilm for a share of the £6bn merchandising revenue generated since the first film in the series premiered in 1977.

So does the filmmaker own all aspects of the film? What rights do the set, costume, prop designers have? Naturally this could (and should?) all be resolved by contract but if there is no contract?

The fact that Ainsworth makes the helmets from the original moulds should not mean anything since the right to make copies does not follow the ownership of the moulds. However in the absence of a contract to resolve this question the fact that the designer was allowed (if he was?) to keep his moulds should weigh in his favor. What a lovely case – I can’t wait to hear what the courts decide.

More on this available at TimesOnline.

Boyle Book Cover Competition

Via an email list I found out that James Boyle, the new Chairman of the Board at Creative Commons and a founder of Science Commons, is holding a contest to design a cover for his new book, The Public Domain: Enclosing the Commons of the Mind. In the book, Boyle argues that more and more of material that used to be free to use without having to pay a fee or ask permission is becoming private property — at the expense of innovation, science, culture and politics.

Details, including specs and a link to some great source material for imagery, are available at the Worth1000 website. Both the book and the cover will be distributed under a CC Attribution-NonCommercial license.

Boyle is a great writer and enjoys exploring legal questions surrounding property in a way which makes it accessible and interesting to the reader. His book Shamans, Software and Spleens: Law and the Construction of the Information Society was a real eye opener for me. I am definitely going to get his new book.

When my PhD was almost finished I announced a similar competition for the design of the book cover and was lucky to get it widely publicized. The whole idea of the competition was actually quite resented and discussed on my blog. Professional designers felt I was cutting them out of the market by asking for free work. Interesting discussions ensued. The results of the competition were posted on my blog and the winner was chosen by popular vote and used on the cover of my PhD.