so long and thanks for all the fish

As some of you may or may not be aware my time at the University of Lund is drawing to a close. Where does a year fly to? Anyway my bags are packed and I have moved back to Göteborg. I have a couple of guest appearances left in the south of Sweden but in reality my time in Lund is over. On the bright side of the equation is that I will be spending a lot less time on trains. Well actually this may not be entirely true since I seem to have agreed to more than my fair share of trips.
Speaking of fish… here is some of the scary fish I savored in Lund…

Serving.JPG by Wrote

Serving by Wrote

The Minature Earth

It’s always nice to re-discover a pleasing site online. One very good site which is an illustration of a thought experiment is The Minature Earth. The original text was written by Donella H. Meadows in 1991 and consists of a portraying the world as a village of 1000 people while maintaining the proportions of the real world. Here are some excerpts:

If the world were a village of 1000 people:

584 would be Asians, 123 would be Africans, 95 would be East and West Europeans, 84 Latin Americans, 55 Soviets (still including for the moment Lithuanians, Latvians, Estonians, etc.), 52 North Americans, 6 Australians and New Zealanders.

The people of the village would have considerable difficulty communicating: 165 people would speak Mandarin, 86 would speak English, 83 Hindi/Urdu, 64 Spanish, 58 Russian & 37 Arabic.

If the world were a village of 1000 persons, there would be five soldiers, seven teachers, one doctor. Of the village’s total annual expenditures of just over $3 million per year, $181,000 would go for weapons and warfare, $159,000 for education, $132,000 for health care.

The facts have been made into a pleasing film which can be seen on the site or on YouTube here. This is the type of thing I would like to use in a lecture but I don’t seem to have the opportunity to slip it in. Naturally it would be interesting to do some fact-checking but the general idea is easy enough to follow.

Because its Sunday

It’s been a long weekend going slowly blind over text and screen. It’s time for a reasonable level of Monday normality to start. But before that it’s time for some light relief. These are from my absolute favorite cartoonist Mattias Adolfsson, he does the most amazing artwork, creative interpretations of our inner animals (or just fun stuff – you decide). I am the proud owner of a framed original. Here are Some Animals from his blog which capture my weekend…

Mattias Adolfsson - Reading Dragon

Mattias Adolfsson - Reading Dragon

Mattias Adolfsson - Computer worker

Mattias Adolfsson - Computer worker

Greener Grass

Sitting indoors typing stupid stupid stupid work stuff. When I take a break and look out the window I see a neighbor sitting on her balcony reading a book in the sunshine. This is totally envious, I want to sit and read a book, stroll in the park and do non-work related things on weekends. So sitting writing a major report makes me really annoyed.

Grapes with licensing agreement

Via Boing Boing comes this marvel of legal wackiness. The plastic bag containing grapes has the text:

The recipient of the produce contained in this package agrees not to propagate or reproduce any portion of the produce, including (but not limited to) seeds, stems, tissue and fruit.

I suppose that the sellers are trying to make an analogy with shrinkwrap licenses. The result, if the text on the bag is upheld in court, would mean that any attempt to grow new grapes from the content of the bag is in violation of the “license” (for the want of a better word). Violating a contract does not mean automatically that the seller or producer can recieve damages so what is left? If you manage to grow something from this bag you will have to give back the original grapes? Its all too confusing.

photo: Grapes with an EULA by dasmart (CC by-nc-nd)

Why altruism?

Recently I have been digging deeper into Darwinism, inspired by reading Dawkins. Now I have always found Darwinism to be the only plausible explaination for the evolution of species but there is one thing that annoys me and it has nothing to do with Mr Darwin.

What annoys me is the need of people to take a theory which is successful in one field and attempt to apply it in places where it does not fit and really does not belong. What I am talking about is the whole question of attempting to use Darwinism to explain the reason for “non-efficient” behaviour from the point of view of species development and survival.

So for example we attempt to mangle poor Darwin’s theories to suit our needs to explain anything from excessive consumption to death defying bravery to building cathedrals. Struggling to explain that people do any of these things by trying to claim that the group or society is helped or made more likely to survive can only be seen as the product of an over productive imagination.

While in Uppsala last week I met (all too briefly) Mikael Nilsson one of the activists behind the site and organisation Stoppa fra lagen nu. The organisation is one of a few activist sites attempting to organise resistance against the unpopular new Swedish surveillance law. Activists such as Mikael spend time and energy attempting gather opinion and to repeal the law.

From a Darwinistic point of view the behaviour of an activist charging windmills is totally without reason. But it is ample proof of the fact that attempting to apply a theory to solve a problem for which it was not intended just leads us down dead ends and futile exercises in trying to put a square peg in a round hole.

Universities pimp out students

Information and news tends to come from many strange source but I was really surprised to find a nasty piece of news in the Göteborg Uni student newspaper. To put it bluntly Göteborg University has made a series of larger or smaller errors. Some just bad ideas while others really bad ideas.

In order to ensure that all students can be reached and to be able to take full advantage of information technology someone decided to provide all students with “official” emails ending with @student.gu.se – on the face of it this may seem like a good idea but I really have no idea why. It would have been better to allow/demand/require all students to register an email address but I don’t want to get into that part right now.

The second mistake was to decide to manage the email system themselves. Which resulted in a couple of years of mismanagement, a lot of frustration and a final collapse of the whole system. Ok, so I am exaggerating it was not a collapse but basically the university admitted defeat – and it is here where the local student newspaper comes in – and have handed the administration of the email to Google.

Now this is a development which has been happening without much fuss all over the world Trinity College Dublin, Arizona State University and Linköping University (another Swede) but it kind of hits me square in the nuts when my home university adopts the scheme.

So why does it bother me that Google has taken over student email at Göteborg Uni? Why does it seem that I am the only one who is bothered by what is supposed to be a comforting fact that the students will still have @student.gu.se as their mail?

What really bugs me is that the university has basically sold its students. Not only that, but the university is a public authority and as such should not be promoting a private company in this way. The University of Gothenburg has approximatly 50,000 students (25 000 full-time students) and 5,000 employees.  This public authority is then used to demand of it’s 50 000 clients that they must become reliant on a private company.

As if this wasn’t enough the recent Swedish FRA law allows surveillance of all communications that pass through Sweden. Since Google’s servers are outside Sweden this means that all the students email will be under surveillance.

This is wrong in so many ways but nobody seems to be reacting to the fact that univesities are pimping out their students for the sake of technical simplicity – when this is not necessary!

The day after

A wonderful full day. Woke up flew to Stockholm, train to Uppsala, lectured at the university, got interviewed. Hopped on the train to Stockholm and gave a lecture at the Technical Museum. Jumped in a taxi and I am now sitting on the train home.

Two appreciative audiences and lots of happy people. I like lecturing and meeting new people. I needed a day like this to balance out the crappy one I had yesterday.

The world ends next month

CERN is the world’s largest particle physics laboratory and on Wednesday (10 September) they will make the first attempt to circulate a beam in the Large Hadron Collider (LHC). The first injection of the beam into the machine will be between 9:00 and 10:00 a. m.

So what is it?

Wikipedia explains: The Large Hadron Collider (LHC) is the world’s largest particle accelerator complex, intended to collide opposing beams of 7 TeV protons. Its main purpose is to explore the validity and limitations of the Standard Model, the current theoretical picture for particle physics. The LHC was built by the European Organization for Nuclear Research (CERN), and lies under the Franco-Swiss border near Geneva, Switzerland.

image from CERN

Some claim (and have attempted to use the courts to prevent the experiments) that the LHC experiments could have potentially disastrous results, in particular they could create “micro black holes”- actually the real experiments that some fear will end the world will not be carried out for another month. The fears are exaggerated and CERN says it’s all safe. This end of the world thing will play havoc with my planning but this is not the first time the end of the world threatened to ruin my plans. I suppose we should get used to this…