Back in the office

It’s kind of creepy. Back in the office my Far Side calender is on 23 January, some of the plants are almost dead, there is a pile of snail mail and little tasks which seem to have been ignored under the principle: “since he isn’t here…” Despite the fact that the temperature is -3 and there is an unseemly pile of work to be done – it’s good to be back in the chair.

While unpacking and organising yesterday I discovered that I had managed to buy “only” these books while in India (in part this was due to a book sale we were take to): The Life of Mahatma Gandhi (by Louis Fischer) this was recommended to me as the authoritative biography. The Argumentative Indian: Writings on Indian Culture, History and Identity (by Amartya Sen) I have not read enough of Senâ??s work but I do like his work. After reading the preface I know that I shall enjoy this work very much. Identity and Violence: The Illusion of Destiny (by Amartya Sen) another of Senâ??s works, this one argues for a better understanding of multiculturalism against violent nationalism.

Madness and Civilization: A history of insanity in the age of reason by Michel Foucault, I do not have my own copy so when this popped up at an Indian book sale: say no more! Inside the Wire: A military intelligence soldier’s eyewitness account of life at Guantanamo (by Erik Saar & Viveca Novak) not sure about the depth but it is a subject of great importance.

Wars of the 21st Century: New Threats New Fears (by Ignacio Ramonet) the nice thing about ending up buying books in India is that the focus shifts from the usual suspects that populate my local stores. Ramonet seems to be very relevant to my interests. Democracy’s Place (Ian Shapiro) simply could not resist this. War and the Media: Reporting Conflict 24/7 (edited by Daya Kishan Thussu & Des Freedman) a exciting anthology on the subject of war & media. The Art of the Feud: Reconceptualizing International Relations (by Jose V. Ciprut) this is an exciting fresh look which I just happened across at the sale.

Simply from the point of view of new input the trip was very rewarding.

Coffee Break Peacemaker

Amongst technical discussions on platforms, systems and semantic webs (making my head spin) we slipped into the more general dangerous philosophical question of what is knowledge? This was sparked off by a discussion on the concept of the learning object as the smallest indivisible learning base. Is it the fact, the sentence, the paragraph, the chapter or the book?

The discussion of what is knowledge and how small the learning object can become turned into a lively discussion, probably since it was a nice break from the technology side of the project.

The main thrust of the argument (well more of a disagreement) was the disagreement with the proposition that all learning objects should (and therefore could) be broken up into more palatable parts. The idea was to include a 500-word (approximate) limit for each such part.

Some of us disagreed that such a thing was possible. That such a normative formal approach could be taken in relation to learning objects. Knowledge can be too complex to always be able to be broken down into a fixed limit.

We shared ideas and put forward metaphors, philosophers and concepts. But in the end we had to agree to disagree since neither side could convince the other. The argument could have continued but we broke up for coffee.

During coffee we were no longer on different sides of the table but on neutral ground – the discussions relaxed but we remained in fundamental disagreement on whether knowledge could or could not be subdivided  – but we all agreed that it was a good argument. Once again the importance of the coffee break  was proven.

Long Long Day

Too many impressions and a long long day. Walked around and found a bookstore where I bought Amartya Senâ??s Identity and Violence â?? The Illusion of Destiny and an anthology edited by Thussu & Freedman entitled War and the Media – Reporting Conflict 24/7.

Then we went to the Indian Institute of Technology to be present at the Creative Commons India launch â?? Welcome! There were speeches by (among others) Joichi Ito & Lawrence Liang which was followed by dinner and conversation. Now itâ??s late and tomorrow is an early start.

Somewhere over Istanbul

The East begins here for me. I guess that from here I shall have to be aware of my own preconceived ideas of what is to be expected but despite my understanding of this my hopes and expectations are battling with my understanding that all my impressions should be neutral. A myth if nothing else.

Jonas and I were early at the airport. The plane however was not. Due to weather conditions the plane was so late that we missed our connection and after a great deal of confusion were rebooked. As I write this we are flying towards Goa. Once in Goa we transfer to a plane to Mumbai. Unfortunately this plane is 1.5 hours late so we will probably miss this connection too. At least we are on the right continent.

Missing connections is a stressful experience â?? but we are both very relaxed. We have discussed taking a train as an alternative method of reaching Mumbai. Why this relaxed attitude. In part itâ??s because we have no alternative. In part itâ??s because this is the way we both are. In part itâ??s because of the corpse in Frankfurt.

Airline delays fade into insignificance. While walking rapidly to our gate hoping that our plane was still there we walked past a part of the corridor which was cordoned off. First I saw the police, then the medics and finally the patient (ex-patient) lying on the floor. Stripped to the waist. A tube in his mouth. The medics were packing up their equipment. There was an eerie air of professionalism among the police and medics packing their equipment and waiting for transportation as we powerwalked past the scene.

All of a sudden rushing to gates, delayed flights and deadlines seemed insignificant. Still in Germany but human life is in the forefront. How petty are the problems I focus uponâ?¦

Book Prize

I am easy to please. I just found out that I have won a copy of â??I väntan pÃ¥ Lenins begravningâ?? by Amanda Lövkvist the book is about activists in St. Petersburg and the title is the somewhat cryptic “Waiting for Lenin’s funeral”. The book competition was organised by Johan Karlsson over at Mothugg – he is on the publishing team of the book publishers Silc.

Depiction of Resistance

Ever wondered who gets to be portrayed as a brave resistance fighter and why? The role of the media in bringing â??the storyâ?? to the attention of the public is crucial. Unfortunately the public (thatâ??s us) is too occupied to carry out real investigations so we generally tend to accept anything the media tells us. Naturally with varying degrees of skepticism.

The skepticism depends to a large degree on several factors: the trustworthiness of the source, the importance of what is being said, the personal impact on our lives, our beliefs and cultures. But mostly we (the public) tend to accept what is being presented before us. Sad, but true.

The first main barrier is the choice to tell the story or not. Certain stories get a great deal of press attention while others get little or none. The next barrier is the presentation of the story. Will those resisting be described as the white or the black hats? Will resistance be legitimized or criminalized? The third barrier is the reconstruction after the fact. What will the victor say of the vanquished? What will be the persistent historic truth once the conflict is over?

Julius Caesar vanquished all of Gaul. After the task he wrote his account of the wars. Generations of children have since then learned their basic Latin language by reading exciting excerpts from his book. Even if we no longer learn Latin Caesars version of the truth remains the dominant story. He was â??forcedâ?? to attack the Gaul in order to protect the Gallic friends of Rome. The fact that he achieved personal fame, an enormous fortune and eventually sole power of Rome was beside the point.

The ability to resist does not build upon the ability to control the dominant truth â?? but no resistance (from a local protest to outright war) can afford to ignore it.

An exciting example of this is the 1966 film The Battle of Algiers from wikipedia:

The film depicts an episode in the war of independence in the then French Algeria, in the capital city of Algiers. It is loosely based on the account of one of the military commanders of the Algerian National Liberation Front (FLN), Saadi Yacef, in his memoir Souvenirs de la Bataille d’Alger. The book, written by Yacef while a prisoner of the French, was meant as propaganda to boost morale among FLN militants. After independence, Yacef was released and became a part of the new government. The Algerian government gave its backing to have a film of his memoirs made and he approached the Italian director Gillo Pontecorvo and screenwriter Franco Solinas with the project. The two dismissed Yacef’s initial treatment as biased toward the Algerian side. While sympathetic with the cause of Algerian nationalism, they insisted on dealing with the events from a distanced point-of-view.

Andrew "Da-Man" Murray

Can you believe that I almost forgot to tell everyone about it? My friend Andrew has just published his first solo work! Too cool. Andrew’s book is called “The Regulation of Cyberspace: Control in the online environment” and is an excellent mix of academia, anecdote, politics, law, raw power and technology.

He cites examples as varied as the online coffee pot at Cambridge to the Live8 ebay scandals of 2005, draws from academic fields of information technology, law, philosophy and physics. His point? Basically the world of Internet regulation is much more complex than we care to accept. Regulation is neither hierarchical nor a question of social practice therefore we must bravely accept this and come to terms with the uncertainty of the situation…

Andrew D. Murray – The Regulation of Cyberspace is going to be influential and long lived. Get it from Amazon here!

Why the internet is cool: reason nr 324

In February last year I wrote a post about a painting by the African artist Pilipil Mulongoy which has been hanging in my home since before I was born. It is, as I wrote, the stuff which makes me and my home. In the post I included a photo

pilipili

A couple of days ago I recieved an email from a publisher working on a book about African art history. They would like to use a picture of the work in their book. Stuff like this cannot happen in the analogue world, or at least it never happened to me.

Video Campaigns and Responses

Starbucks and the government of Ethiopia have been discussing the trademark rights to some of the finest coffee in the world. The root of the conflict is that Starbucks has not recognised Ethiopia’s ownership of the Sidamo, Harar and Yirgacheffe names. (BBC News 26 October & 30 November 2006).

Oxfam began a campaign against Starbucks in order to help the Ethiopian coffee farmers. The idea is that if Starbucks signs the agreement with the Ethiopian intellectual property office the Ethiopian farmers will have more control over their products and this will result in better prices.

The Oxfam campaign is a typical online/offline mix with physical demonstrations being augmented with an information website containing documentation, photographs etc, and an â??act nowâ?? part where individuals can get involved on their own. A textbook example of an information campaign.

Oxfam have also created a video shot from their â??The Starbucks Day of Actionâ?? on December 16. The most natural place to leave a video on the Internet today is on the site YouTube so naturally Oxfam posted their video on YouTube (Watch it here). The video features demonstrators explaining their views and the positive reactions of people they meet.

What is interesting is not that the Internet is being used in this way but rather the Starbucks response. Starbucks created their own video response on December 20th  featuring the Head of Starbucks Coffee team answering questions. They too posted their video on YouTube (watch the Starbucks response on YouTube).

What is unique about the whole story is the way in which Starbucks as a corporation reacted to the unconventional protest use of YouTube. By responding in kind they showed that they understand the way in which information is created and consumed on the Internet.

Digital video cameras – and in particular mobile phone video cameras – have made the documentation of resistance a necessity. Websites such as YouTube and Google video have created an infrastructure for sharing of the results. By removing the need for camera crews, production teams and broadcast capabilities the creation and distribution of film has fallen into the hands of the creative amateur. The implications of this is that both the protesters and their corporate targets need to quickly master and use this medium of communication.

Whatever the outcome of the Oxfam campaign â?? this is the future of resistance information warfare.

The horror, the horror

After a serious review of my library the stark realization that something must be done has finally arrived. Some of the books have been donated to causes, some have actually been thrown away (this post is entitled â??the horrorâ??).

Then to finish the list of things that can be done to books â?? here is a list of books that are being given away. Just add a comment of which books you would prefer and I will send them to you.

Alfred Basil Lubbock â?? The Log of the Cutty Sark

The Memoirs of Field Marshall Kesselring

Karateâ??s History and traditions â?? Bruce A. Haines

Kreuger: Genius & Swindler â?? Robert Shaplen

The Condition of Modernity â?? David Harvey

The Philosophy of Schopenhauer â?? Edited Irwin Edman

The Gay Science â?? Fredrich Neitzsche

The Age of Capital â?? E. J. Hobsbawm

This is a totally odd list. Looking at it now makes me wonder what kind of library I have. Actually have, Since I am getting rid of these books…