Da Vinci Code in Court

Two of the three authors of “The Holy Blood and the Holy Grail” are suing the publisher of Dan Brown’s “The Da Vinci Code” for for breach of UK copyright in the UK editions of the book. Today through a series of takeovers Random House is the publisher of both books.

“The Holy Blood and the Holy Grail” was published in 1982 and claimed that Jesus did not die on the cross, but married Mary Magdalene and had a child by her.

The legal problem is that an idea for a book is not itself protected, but the actual content of a book is. So its not copyright infringement if two books appear with the same idea as long as they dont directly copy or adapt the earlier text.

So both books are about the same thing – not copyright violation. But what about the architecture of the book? It may be plagiarism but is it copyright violation to describe a similar scene in two different books?

day 13

After a few days offline in the middle of snowy nowhere. I have read the entire work and begun the serious process of editing. Today I have now edited a little more than half the book. I am on the 53rd version of my document and I am becoming more paranoid about data-loss for each day and version. Lots of backups now.

I thought that the backups would make the work shorter but I was wrong. Today the word count is 91856 words which is an increase by 1502 words since the last time I opened the file.

Even though there are still 13 more days to go I hand everything over to my supervisor tommorrow for him to read while he is travelling. On his return I have the weekend to edit his comments before handing it all in to the internal reviewer who will be my opponent on the senior seminar on the 15 March.
The reading tip of the day is specialist stuff – Blanke “Robust Notice” and “Informed Consent”: The Keys to Successful Spyware Legislation, Columbia Science and Technology Law Review 2006 Vol 7.

A long time ago I had to wear a school uniform with this badge… never would have guessed where I ended up…

Stella Maris College, Malta

Advice to a shiny new phd student

A friend of mine, Johan Söderberg, has just been accepted as a Phd student in Science and Technology Studies at the University of Göteborg at the same time I am struggling to meet the final deadline for my Phd studies. It feels almost natural to indulge in a bit of advice giving to the new student. In part this advice is supposed to balance the stuff I have previously written on the subject such as this.

I dislike disclaimers but this post needs one. Following any advice, including this advice, is the same as entering into Phd studies. You do it at your own risk.

First Advice: Write down 10 things you want to achieve. Include ideas, expectations, dreams and hopes. Put the list into an envelope and do not open until you are halfway or two-thirds through your Phd period. Remember the things you write down should be seen as advice to your future self. Most probably you will be cynical and jaded to your own advice but take your list seriously when you read it.

Second Advice: If you have the inclination to blog â?? then do so. There are loads of arguments for (here) and against (here) academic blogging. Certain supervisors would view it as a waste of time and energy but I disagree. Any activity which involves the formulation and presentation of ideas is an important activity for a Phd.

Third Advice: Go international. As a Phd you are part of an international community (urgh I am so sick of that word). You may not understand the thesis of a Biochemist is about but you are both struggling with the production of text, supervisors, universities, conferences, journals and much more� Finding people who understand what you do is important. Unless they are also in academia, your friends and family will just think that you never left school and therefore are still immature and naïve.

Fourth Advice: Be helpful and friendly to your colleagues. I have NEVER understood the competitive side of some Phd students who attempt to suppress others. I will never understand the reason why certain people with Phdâ??s tend to forget the reality of the situation and bully Phd students. Picking on people who cannot fight back does not mean you are powerful. It means you are a weak human being.

Fifth Advice: Pick a cartoon. I donâ??t know why. Almost every Phd student I have come across has a cartoon. OK so I have not conducted serious applied empirical studies. The cartoon becomes an icon or a totem. Reading them as metaphysical representations of your daily life adds a new dimension. Calvin & Hobbes work well for this. Piled Higher and Deeper are an obvious choice â?? but that it never a bad thing.

Sixth Advice: Trust no one! Donâ??t believe anything anyone tells you about the Phd. It is an experience. You make the experience. Naturally you are affected by reality but how you choose to accept reality is up to you.

Seventh Advice: Question everything! Conducting research means questioning everything. Its like a return to childhood with the endless naïve questioning of accepted values. Yes it makes you a pain if you have to ask other people questions or tell them your results. But thatâ??s the point. Unquestioned doctrine is dead thought. Even if you arrive at the same conclusion as you did before you began to question then at least you have thought for yourself.

Eighth Advice: Go International 2. Beg, borrow or apply for grants. Travel to conferences and meet people who are smarter than you. Sitting within the confines of your own department is not going to broaden your horizons. You must read and relate to the works of others in your field outside your department if you are to be good at what you do. Relating to your own department may work in the short term.

Ninth Advice: Write! Write! Write! From the day you begin your Phd work. Write! Reading is important but donâ??t get stuck there. Donâ??t wait until you have read â??everythingâ?? or the next important book before starting. If you do not have text you cannot re-write. Keep a research diary if you like â?? this is not a blog â?? in it you write all your research thoughts and ideas. Do not read a book without writing your thoughts about the book (including references to the work and to others). You have no idea how helpful this will be.

Tenth Advice: Enjoy! If you do not enjoy what you do your text will reflect this. If your text reflects this then your thesis will not be interesting for the reader. If you do not enjoy what you do how are you ever going to find the energy to read all the texts, discuss them with others, write all your texts and beg others to discuss them with you?

human enhancement

A new book from the on the subject of human enhancement entitled â??Better Humans? The politics of human enhancement and life extensionâ?? (edited by
Paul Miller & James Wilsdon) is out now and available for download.

This is from the online blurb:

We all share a desire for self-improvement. Whether through education, work, parenthood or adhering to religious or ethical codesâ?¦more consumerist pursuits hold the key to self-improvement: working out in the gym, wearing makeup, buying new clothes, or indulging in a spot of cosmetic surgery.â?¦Within the next 30 years, it may become commonplace to alter the genetic make-up of our children, to insert artificial implants into our bodies, or to radically extend life expectancy.

The book is a collection of 12 essays on the implications of human enhancement technologies and includes chapters like â??Is it wrong to try to improve human nature?â?? (by Arthur Caplan, â??Brain gainâ?? (by Steven Rose), â??Better by designâ?? (by Sarah Franklin) & â??The unenhanced underclassâ?? (by Gregor Wolbring).

via Techne

Memory & Art

This painting has been with me since I was born. Its almost strange to have had something for this long and still discuss who owns it. Does it belong to the culture from where it came? Many cultures claim art that has ended up in foreign countries. Does it belong to the artist? Intellectual property is life + 70 years and moral rights last forever… What did my distant relative agree upon (and with whom) when he bought the painting in Africa and transported it to Sweden? It has since then travelled to many other places in the world. Does it matter? One day I must write a longer analysis on this topic… a book maybe?

pilipili

About the artist: Pilipil Mulongoy
Born in 1916, he occupies an exceptional place in Congolese painting; they call him the Sorcerer of African luxuriance. Son of a fisherman from Lualaba, he participated in hunting and fishing where he gathered these themes which he later transposed onto his canvas. Pilipili Mulongoy studied in the atelier and later, the Academy of Beaux-Arts of Romain Desposes in Lubumbashi where he developed an essential understanding and skill in the plastic arts in the vast African subcontinent. Pilipili became a professor and integrated a new studio, the “Hangar” at the Academy.
The text was taken long ago from somewhere else… I would love to acknowledge the source but I cannot remember or find where I found it. Another flaw with a copyright system is that you have to remember things like this! (last part in italics added later).

Book Cover Art

Designing book covers is a difficult and underestimated art. To anyone who has finally finished a book the ordeal of book cover design is awful. Naturally if there is an art then there must be a group of afficionados & critics. Enter Book Covers, a site dedicated to viewing and discussing book covers.

I managed to write this post without even attempting a joke about judging books by their covers!

Open Access

This book-chapter preprint takes an in-depth look at the open access movement with special attention to the perceived meaning of the term “open access” within it, the use of Creative Commons Licenses, and real-world access distinctions between different types of open access materials.  After a brief consideration of some major general benefits of open access, it examines OA’s benefits for libraries and discusses a number of ways that libraries can potentially support the movement, with a consideration of funding issues. (The preprint does not reflect any editorial changes that may be made.)

It will appear in: Jacobs, Mark, ed. Electronic Resources Librarians: The Human Element of the Digital Information Age. Binghamton, NY: Haworth Press, 2006.

Warhol Foundation on Copyright

Lessig has written (in Wired) about the Warhol foundation’s application of copyright law. Joel Wachs, the president of the foundation says:

“We’re Lessig when it comes to artists and scholars” and “Disney when it comes to commercial use.”

Basically they allow artists to build upon Warhol’s work and academics to use his work for a nominal fee. But are tough on commercial use. This is in keeping with Warhol’s idea of art. Borrow from your surroundings and use it.

More and more I find this the right way to go. Commenting on our surroundings should be permissable – the only real prohibition should be plagiarism. Only copying without adding does not provide anything new.

Partly this position may come from the fact that I teach and many students dont realise what plagiarism is. I have even had students get angry with me when I uncovered their cheats. In the worst case a student attempted to pass off my work as his.

The word plagiarism comes from latin and refers to the activity of stealing anothers slaves. The roman poet Martialis wrote:

The book which you are reading aloud is mine, Fidentinus; but, while you read it so badly, it begins to be yours.
– Epigrams (bk. I, ep. 38)

Oh, and before any of my students come across this and ask: NO bad plagiarism does not make your work original even if you can cite Martialis!

Happy Phd Writer?

In his work Myth of Sisyphus, Albert Camus writes about the meaning of life and basically the question why we do not commit suicide. The first sentance says it all: “There is only one really serious philosophical problem, and that is suicide.”

Camus takes the myth of Sisyphus as a metaphor for life. Sisyphus was a smart man who managed to trick the god of the underworld to let him go back for a brief errend. Once Sisyphus gets home he refuses to return to Hades – eventually he is forced back. As a punishment he is forced to role a huge stone up a hill only to have it role down again and Sisyphus must start again from the begining.

Sisyphus rock

This is usally seen as the pointless and depressing work. However Camus finishes his book with the words:

“I leave Sisyphus at the foot of the mountain! One always finds one’s burden again. But Sisyphus teaches the higher fidelity that negates the gods and raises rocks. He too concludes that all is well. This universe henceforth without a master seems to him neither sterile nor futile. Each atom of that stone, each mineral flake of that night filled mountain, in itself forms a world. The strugg le itself toward the heights is enough to fill a man’s heart. One must imagine Sisyphus happy.”

Right now I am spending long days in front of the computer attempting to reach the big deadline (see counter to the right) and hand in my Phd thesis. Its tiring and not very uplifting. At times very pointless. At this stage I am prepared to disagree with Camus. Sisyphus is not happy. He has no time for hapiness and no chance of free time to look forward to.