Open Maps

Maps have always been considered valuable commodities. Therefore protecting them from illegal copying is of vital importance. However this protection also limits the ways in which maps can be adapted and used.

This is what OSM wants to rememdy. OpenStreetMap (OSM) is a voluntary not-for-profit organisation. The goal of OSM is to provide free maps that can be used by anyone.

So how does it work?

Anyone with a handheld Global Positioning System can start mapping straight away. You need to set your GPS to record tracks and then go for a walk or for a bike ride or a drive. Walk around some streets in your neighbourhood, making some notes about the street names and any one way streets or round-a-bouts that you find. When you get home, plug your GPS into your computer and upload the tracks that you recorded onto the OSM website. Within an hour or so, you tracks will appear on the website. You can then use the online tools to create a new map of the roads and street names that anyone in the world will be able to see.

This weekend they carried out their Mapchester project were over 40 participants, armed with GPS equipment mapped out Manchester.

What a cool idea!

Blogging in the private/public divide

Part of blogging is attempting to figure out why we blog? Not all blogs pose this question but it appears often enough* to be recognised as being a common question. This question becomes even more relevant when the blogger takes active risks by blogging.

In an earlier post (blogging revisited 21/1105) I reported about an article concerned with the risks being taken by job-seeking academics who blog. The author of the article wrote that their blogs prevented the potential employer from hiring since they revealed a different side to the applicant than that presented at the formal interview.

A temporary prosecutor in San Francisco blogged about a case he was prosecuting:
Karnow didn’t find the postings prejudicial enough to throw out the entire case, as the defense wanted. But in turning down that motion to dismiss this week, the judge still came down hard on ex-prosecutor Jay Kuo, calling his conduct “juvenile, obnoxious and unprofessional.” … (via Lunda Wright)

Other bloggers take greater risks as whistleblowers or reporting on corrupt and/or repressive governments. While some bloggers and blogs are well protected using different means many are open and tracing the authors is a (relatively) easy task.

Organisations such as the EFF have created documents to help those who need to blog anonymously â??How to Blog Safely (About Work or Anything Else)â?? but these are either not widely known or widely used.
There seems to be something special about the blog and its place in the private/public divide. The blog is a private diary and yet it is open to the world.  The privacy promotes the sharing of secrets while the public the desire to communicate.

Why take the risks? Are they really risks or is blogging perceived to be a private act? Even though most bloggers are aware of their publicâ?¦

*Some examples from Google on the search â??why I blogâ??
WatermarkJacobsenUnder the sunMedia Metamorphosis

On minor annoyances

Train travel is great! I like sitting and working on trains. Its like an office with a view. Today the Swedish trains have wifi (not very good but still wifi) which means that even online work can be done (unless it demands heavy bandwidth). The main problem is battery time. I try to book seats next to the power outlets (sad â?? isnâ??t it?) but on this trip I could not. Usually this can be fixed on the train.

Across the aisle from me a policeman (the gold braid suggests an officer) had a seat with the power outlet so I asked politely if he was going to use the outlet or if he could consider changing seats. He gruffly stated that he needed the outlet, drank his complementary coffee and fell asleep.

I worked fast and now I feel that I wanted to blog this on the last dregs of my battery life while the policeman snores gently to the rocking of the train.

Nobody likes to exchange seats, but most often do. Am I more annoyed by this man because of his occupation? Was his gruff response due to a need to command the situation? Did he ever intend to use the outlet?

Technology based life is driven by lots of small annoyances – the search for power being among the foremost. But our appliances demand more care and attention from us. Their control over our behaviour can be seen in the way in which we are reminded by the appliances to do their bidding. Washing machines, tumble dryers and microwaves annoyingly remind us to empty them â?? they will not be silent until we react. Most mobile devices remind us of their battery status, cars remind us when doors are open or seatbelts are unused.

The tyranny of these devices is for our comfort and security â?? but at the cost of our annoyance. They police use by their presence and remind us of their needs. The same can be said of the sleeping policeman across the aisle. He rests in full knowledge that his occupation is vital to society â?? something he takes advantage of â?? this is symbolised by non-use of the power outlet. He is like the tumble dryer I filled before leaving home that will beep noisily, annoyingly, in futility until I return.

Digital solidaritet och opinionsbildning

Digital Solidaritet och opinionsbildning

Information ses allt mer som en vara att tjäna pengar på och allt mindre som en social rättighet. Upphovsrätten stärks och patent breder ut sig till det immateriella området.

Politiker och företag ser i ökad omfattning information som ett problem som måste kontrolleras, övervakas och beläggas med sekretess. Samtidigt finns idag möjligheter att samla, kopiera och sprida information i en helt ny omfattning. Informationen blir inte mindre värd för att den används. Tvärtom ökar den i värde.

Det är dags att solidaritets- och rättviserörelser tar hänsyn till allt detta i sitt informationsarbete. Vi måste utveckla en mer solidarisk och gemensam informationshantering och opinionsbildning. Förutsättningarna är bättre än någonsin. Med denna konferens vill vi stimulera den gemensamma diskussionen i dessa frågor.

Ur programet:
Delad information, effektiv information â?? Rasmus Fleischer, frilansjournalist och aktiv i PiratbyrÃ¥n, argumenterar för det rationella med att vara solidarisk pÃ¥ informationsomrÃ¥det.

Fri information i praktiken: Creative Commons och Open Access â?? Mathias Klang, doktorand vid Göteborgs Universitet och projektledare för Creative Commons i Sverige, hjälper dig att befria informationen.

Kampen om informationen â?? Lars Ilshammar, författare och förestÃ¥ndare för Arbetarrörelsens Arkiv och Bibliotek, ger oss en övergripande bild av den globala kampen mellan Ã?ppnare som vill frigöra informationen och Stängare som vill lÃ¥sa in den.

Mer information finns hos Världsbiblioteket
När: 15/5, kl. 12:30â??17:00
Var: Solidaritetsrörelsens Hus, Tegelviksgatan 40, Stockholm
Arr: Globalportalen och Världsbiblioteket

Street Art & Advertising

Yesterday I saw this poster.

Its an advert for an energy substitute. The basic premise is that many people have a banana in their training bags but the banana is not good enough to help the body get the amounts of carbohydrates and proteins it needs after a workout. Therefore bananas are for monkeys.

While I could argue about the eating habits of monkeys (not that many bananas) that is not what I want to do. The point of this post is to talk about advertising.

The inspiration for this poster has been taken from grafitti – this can be seen by the imitation of stencils and the mock access paint running down the poster. The ad-company has obviously been inspired by street artists, such as Banksy. This is one of Banksy’s works below.

My question is wouldnt it be nice if the commercial use of art in advertising was openly recognised and acknowledged?
Advertisers tend to rely on the outside world for their inspiration but see no need to admit the fact that they are borrowing from a wider culture. I realise that this is asking a lot but shouldnt advertisers acknowledge these sources?

Open Access Grows

Open J-Gate portal (www.openj-gate.com), was launched by Prof. Jean-Claude Guedon yesterday.

Open J-Gate is an electronic gateway to global journal literature in open access domain. It is also a database of journal literature, indexed from 3000+ open access journals, with links to full text at Publisher sites. Open J-Gate Features and Benefits:

  • Open J-Gate indexes articles from 3000+ academic, research and industry journals. More than 1500 of them are peer-reviewed scholarly journals.
  • Links to one million+ open access articles
  • This number is growing with 300000+ new articles added every year. Full-text links are regularly validated.

Day 10

So much for the short break. Cant keep away. Also I have been getting some early feedback from some people. The new count is + 650 words (93163). Also the reading tip of the day is Savirinuthu “Open Source, Code and Architecture: Its the Memes Stupid” International Review of Law, Computers & Technology, Volume 19, Number 3 / November 2005 pp 341 – 362.

Which unfortunately is not available for free but the library should have a copy. Another reason to support open access!

In addition to this I have news that my examination committee has been chosen. I cannot write about them but I am happy with the choice. For you gender studies people the committee will consist of 1 woman & 2 men.

This is not the Committee!

day 13

After a few days offline in the middle of snowy nowhere. I have read the entire work and begun the serious process of editing. Today I have now edited a little more than half the book. I am on the 53rd version of my document and I am becoming more paranoid about data-loss for each day and version. Lots of backups now.

I thought that the backups would make the work shorter but I was wrong. Today the word count is 91856 words which is an increase by 1502 words since the last time I opened the file.

Even though there are still 13 more days to go I hand everything over to my supervisor tommorrow for him to read while he is travelling. On his return I have the weekend to edit his comments before handing it all in to the internal reviewer who will be my opponent on the senior seminar on the 15 March.
The reading tip of the day is specialist stuff – Blanke “Robust Notice” and “Informed Consent”: The Keys to Successful Spyware Legislation, Columbia Science and Technology Law Review 2006 Vol 7.

A long time ago I had to wear a school uniform with this badge… never would have guessed where I ended up…

Stella Maris College, Malta

23 days

Todays production was +1478 bringing the total up to 177 pages and 87 064 words. It was a good day.

And the countdown is still in the twenties. Today was lots of work on filters & censorship (Look at OpenNet iniative). On Yahoo! helping China chase cyberdissidents and Google creating a ideologically clean (Chinese style) search engine for China. Its obvious that the companies are bending over backwards to gain access to the Chinese market. Despite all the corporate retoric their actions speak louder than words.

censorship
Censorship by Eric Drooker

Reading tip for the weekend: Rosemary Coombe “Commodity Culture, Private Censorship, Branded Environments, and Global Trade Politics: Intellectual Property as a Topic of Law and Society Research

Advice to a shiny new phd student

A friend of mine, Johan Söderberg, has just been accepted as a Phd student in Science and Technology Studies at the University of Göteborg at the same time I am struggling to meet the final deadline for my Phd studies. It feels almost natural to indulge in a bit of advice giving to the new student. In part this advice is supposed to balance the stuff I have previously written on the subject such as this.

I dislike disclaimers but this post needs one. Following any advice, including this advice, is the same as entering into Phd studies. You do it at your own risk.

First Advice: Write down 10 things you want to achieve. Include ideas, expectations, dreams and hopes. Put the list into an envelope and do not open until you are halfway or two-thirds through your Phd period. Remember the things you write down should be seen as advice to your future self. Most probably you will be cynical and jaded to your own advice but take your list seriously when you read it.

Second Advice: If you have the inclination to blog â?? then do so. There are loads of arguments for (here) and against (here) academic blogging. Certain supervisors would view it as a waste of time and energy but I disagree. Any activity which involves the formulation and presentation of ideas is an important activity for a Phd.

Third Advice: Go international. As a Phd you are part of an international community (urgh I am so sick of that word). You may not understand the thesis of a Biochemist is about but you are both struggling with the production of text, supervisors, universities, conferences, journals and much more� Finding people who understand what you do is important. Unless they are also in academia, your friends and family will just think that you never left school and therefore are still immature and naïve.

Fourth Advice: Be helpful and friendly to your colleagues. I have NEVER understood the competitive side of some Phd students who attempt to suppress others. I will never understand the reason why certain people with Phdâ??s tend to forget the reality of the situation and bully Phd students. Picking on people who cannot fight back does not mean you are powerful. It means you are a weak human being.

Fifth Advice: Pick a cartoon. I donâ??t know why. Almost every Phd student I have come across has a cartoon. OK so I have not conducted serious applied empirical studies. The cartoon becomes an icon or a totem. Reading them as metaphysical representations of your daily life adds a new dimension. Calvin & Hobbes work well for this. Piled Higher and Deeper are an obvious choice â?? but that it never a bad thing.

Sixth Advice: Trust no one! Donâ??t believe anything anyone tells you about the Phd. It is an experience. You make the experience. Naturally you are affected by reality but how you choose to accept reality is up to you.

Seventh Advice: Question everything! Conducting research means questioning everything. Its like a return to childhood with the endless naïve questioning of accepted values. Yes it makes you a pain if you have to ask other people questions or tell them your results. But thatâ??s the point. Unquestioned doctrine is dead thought. Even if you arrive at the same conclusion as you did before you began to question then at least you have thought for yourself.

Eighth Advice: Go International 2. Beg, borrow or apply for grants. Travel to conferences and meet people who are smarter than you. Sitting within the confines of your own department is not going to broaden your horizons. You must read and relate to the works of others in your field outside your department if you are to be good at what you do. Relating to your own department may work in the short term.

Ninth Advice: Write! Write! Write! From the day you begin your Phd work. Write! Reading is important but donâ??t get stuck there. Donâ??t wait until you have read â??everythingâ?? or the next important book before starting. If you do not have text you cannot re-write. Keep a research diary if you like â?? this is not a blog â?? in it you write all your research thoughts and ideas. Do not read a book without writing your thoughts about the book (including references to the work and to others). You have no idea how helpful this will be.

Tenth Advice: Enjoy! If you do not enjoy what you do your text will reflect this. If your text reflects this then your thesis will not be interesting for the reader. If you do not enjoy what you do how are you ever going to find the energy to read all the texts, discuss them with others, write all your texts and beg others to discuss them with you?