Blogging revisited

In a previous entry I reported reasons why a blogger (especially academic) should blog. Naturally these views are not unanimous. Here is an anonymous submission to the Chronicle of Higher Education signed by the pseudonym Ivan Tribble. Remember the Tribbles from original star trek fame? Small furry, soft, gentle animals whose cute appearance and soothing purring endears them to every sentient race which encounters themâ??with one notable exception: Klingons.

Anyway Ivan Tribble writes about blogs:

â??The pertinent question for bloggers is simply, Why? What is the purpose of broadcasting one’s unfiltered thoughts to the whole wired world? It’s not hard to imagine legitimate, constructive applications for such a forum. But it’s also not hard to find examples of the worst kinds of uses.

A blog easily becomes a therapeutic outlet, a place to vent petty gripes and frustrations stemming from congested traffic, rude sales clerks, or unpleasant national news. It becomes an open diary or confessional booth, where inward thoughts are publicly aired.

Worst of all, for professional academics, it’s a publishing medium with no vetting process, no review board, and no editor. The author is the sole judge of what constitutes publishable material, and the medium allows for instantaneous distribution. After wrapping up a juicy rant at 3 a.m., it only takes a few clicks to put it into global circulation.â??

The more positive approach to blogging mentioned above (Alex Soojung-Kim Pangâ??s If you’ve got a day job…) focused on four reasons to blog: Practice of the skill of writing, gain readers fame & credibility, participate in a discourse and finally market yourself. All these four are important to the academic (and to the blogger).

Tribbleâ??s argument against the blog concern the situation where you are a job applicant and the stuff which you have written online can be used against you. Both when the committee looked at the applicants online appearance â??…it turned out to be every bit as eye-opening as a train wreck.â?? Another aspect which causes blogging concern is the very existence of the blog… â??Several committee members expressed concern that a blogger who joined our staff might air departmental dirty laundry (real or imagined) on the cyber clothesline for the world to see. Past good behavior is no guarantee against future lapses of professional decorum.â??

tribble
Captain Kirk with Tribbles

So basically the blog is like the Tribble – cute, furry and soothing to all (except the Klingons) but remember the problem with Tribbles? The crew of the Starship Enterprise spent so much time cuddling with, and being cuddled by, the Tribbles that they no longer functioned as a crew. In a sense the blog can become like Tribbles. Surrounded by both our own and others we exist in a quasi world of our own creation which is not a bad thing unless we replace the â??realâ?? world with the blogged one.

Vägval Vänster & Upphovsrätt

Vägval Vänster har lagt upp information om mötet nu på onsdag (imorgon).
http://www.vagvalvanster.se/arkiv.asp?id=666

Upphovsrättsfrågan som politik och kulturuttryck Varför är upphovsrätten så omdiskuterad? Varför är så många intresserade av begrepp som copyleft, fildelning, GNU-licenser och open source? På onsdagen den 5 oktober diskuteras en av vår tids största politiska stridsfrågor och mest tidstypiska kulturuttryck.

Upphovsrättsfrågan som politik och kulturuttryck

Varför är upphovsrätten så omdiskuterad? Varför är så många intresserade av begrepp som copyleft, fildelning, GNU-licenser och open source? På onsdagen den 5e oktober tar vi upp en av vår tids största politiska stridsfrågor och mest tidstypiska kulturuttryck.

PÃ¥ podiet finns:
– Linus Dahlander, I-sektionen, Chalmers
– Mathias Klang, Creative Commons
РKarl Palm̴s, CBiS, GU
– Henrik Sandklef, Free Software Foundation
– Inger Sundberg, Free Software Foundation
РJohan Șderberg
– Jonas Ã?berg, Informatik, GU

Plats & Tid: Viktoriagatan 13, 18h30.

Välkommna

Autumn Term 2005

Well its official. Summer is finally over and the Autumn (Fall) term is upon us. Sweden only has two terms. This term (besides the usual extra stuff) my main focus is on two courses:

Computer Ethics РThis will be a traditional course with lectures in lecture halls (in G̦teborg). I am looking forward to this. Course information in Swedish can be found here.

Open Source/Free Sofware: Theory and Philosophy – The course is a distance learning course (in English) which means that it does not have lectures or exams as we are used to. Instead, we have divided the course into one thematic area per week that we read about and discuss. To get the most of the course, we encourage everyone to follow this course plan and participate in the discussions at the same time as fellow students.

FELLOWSHIPS ON OPEN INFORMATION POLICY

Fellowships on Open Information Policy by the Open Society Institute www.soros.org

Deadline for applications: September 20, 2005

Eligible are candidates from Central and Eastern Europe, the former Soviet Union, and Mongolia, as well as Africa, South and Southeast Asia, and the Middle East.

The International Policy Fellowship Program (IPF) of the Open Society Institute has issued its annual call for fellowship proposals. Open Information Policy is one of the program’s focal areas this year. Here are details concerning this area, taken from the IPF website at www.soros.org/initiatives/ipf.

GPL in Europe

“The GPLâ??s major problem is that the right of communication to the public is not provided explicitly amongst the granted rights, and that a clause limits furthermore the granted rights to what is explicitly provided by the license. Moreover, the GPL is known for being the most viral license ever, whereas massive spreading through dynamic linkage is not the aim of the European Commission.”

This is a quote from a Study into Open Source Licensing of software developed by The European Commission entitled “Report on Open Source Licensing of software developed by The European Commission (applied to the CIRCA solution) 16th December, 2004” by Séverine Dusollier, Philippe Laurent & Patrice-Emmanuel Schmitz.
http://europa.eu.int/idabc/en/document/2623/5585#eupl

Right to communication
The major problem with the GPL is that the right to communication to the public is not explicitly provided in the license?

“The right to communication to the public”? I am unsure which right the authors are referring to. However the GPL is explicit in that once software is licensed under the GPL the source code must be available and the software itself can be used for any purpose.

Most viral
“Moreover, the GPL is known for being the most viral license ever, whereas massive spreading through dynamic linkage is not the aim of the European Commission.” – Once again I am unsure what the authors are concerned about. The point of article 2 (the viral or vaccination effect) is not “massive spreading through dynamic linkage” (which sounds terrifying even if I dont know what it means). The viral effect entails that you cannot take code which has been released under the GPL (made free for all) and use it in part in code which you do not intend to make freely available for all. Simple – but not scary.

Berlin Declaration progress in Sweden (in Swedish)

SUHF:s (Sveriges universitets- och högskoleförbund) styrelse antog vid sitt möte den 8 juni 2005 rekommendationer med anledning av undertecknandet av Berlindeklarationen.

1. Införa en policy som starkt rekommenderar att deras forskare deponerar en kopia av varje publicerad artikel i ett öppet, digitalt arkiv och
2. Uppmuntra forskarna att publicera sina forskningsartiklar i fritt tillgängliga vetenskapliga tidskrifter när en lämplig sådan existerar och ge det stöd som krävs för att detta ska vara möjligt.

Bakgrund

Berlindeklarationen innebär:
â?¢ encouraging our researchers/grant recipients to publish their work according to the principles of the open access paradigm.
â?¢ encouraging the holders of cultural heritage to support open access by providing their resources on the Internet.
â?¢ developing means and ways to evaluate open access contributions and online-journals in order to maintain the standards of quality assurance and good scientific practice.
â?¢ advocating that open access publication be recognized in promotion and tenure evaluation.
â?¢ advocating the intrinsic merit of contributions to an open access infrastructure by software tool devel-opment, content provision, metadata creation, or the publication of individual articles

Under våren 2005 antogs två rekommendationer:
In order to implement the Berlin Declaration institutions should:
1. implement a policy to require their researchers to deposit a copy of all their published articles in an open access repository and
2. encourage their researchers to publish their research articles in open access journals where a suitable journal exists and provide the support to enable that to happen.

Open Access Journal

Copyright, a new open-access, peer-reviewed journal led by a renowned editorial team, seeks papers on all aspects of copyright in the Internet age. The journal features a rapid review and publication time while maintaining rigorous standards regarding the quality of the work. Copyright focuses on detailed research and case studies vetted by peer-review; opinion pieces and shorter communications are also invited and will be accepted at the editors’ discretion. Because the journal is open-access, the author retains the copyright to his or her works.

Copyright

Less integrity in Sweden – again!

The Minister of Justice in Sweden wants to allow the police to bug telephones even when no concrete suspicion of crime exists. A proposal to amend the law to allow this will be presented in autumn.

The minister says that this is part of a policy to combat terrorism â?? but he also states that politics is not being formulated by terrorist attacks.

As usual the concern for personal integrity is not high on the political agenda.

Maybe someone should tell him that the whole point of combatting terrorism is to preserve an open society. If we loose this the terrorists are not only dictating policy & politics but actually winning. If European countries such as the UK & Spain remember this in spite of terror attacks then why cannot Sweden (which has not been attacked) be more interested in integrity?