21 days

Sunday. A bright full moon outside in a clear black sky. Today I re-worked the case study on property in virtual worlds and have added 1219 new words to the thesis production. Writing on property made me think about the Seagulls in Finding Nemo “Mine, Mine, Mine, Mine…”

Seagulls in Finding Nemo

The recommended reading of today is from the entry on Property from the Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy.

22 days

Another 501 words added to the list. Making the total 87 565 spread over 178 pages. Today the work was on the Foucault & the Panopticon (Foucault Power/Knowledge 1980):

There is no need for arms, physical violence, material constraints. Just a gaze. An inspecting gaze, a gaze which each individual under its weight will end up by interiorising to the point that he is his own overseer, each individual thus exercising this surveillance over, and against himself. A superb formula: power exercised continuously and for what turns out to be a minimal cost.

The reading tip of the day is “Panoptic Power and the Pathologisation of Vision” by Majid Yar.

23 days

Todays production was +1478 bringing the total up to 177 pages and 87 064 words. It was a good day.

And the countdown is still in the twenties. Today was lots of work on filters & censorship (Look at OpenNet iniative). On Yahoo! helping China chase cyberdissidents and Google creating a ideologically clean (Chinese style) search engine for China. Its obvious that the companies are bending over backwards to gain access to the Chinese market. Despite all the corporate retoric their actions speak louder than words.

censorship
Censorship by Eric Drooker

Reading tip for the weekend: Rosemary Coombe “Commodity Culture, Private Censorship, Branded Environments, and Global Trade Politics: Intellectual Property as a Topic of Law and Society Research

Advice to a shiny new phd student

A friend of mine, Johan Söderberg, has just been accepted as a Phd student in Science and Technology Studies at the University of Göteborg at the same time I am struggling to meet the final deadline for my Phd studies. It feels almost natural to indulge in a bit of advice giving to the new student. In part this advice is supposed to balance the stuff I have previously written on the subject such as this.

I dislike disclaimers but this post needs one. Following any advice, including this advice, is the same as entering into Phd studies. You do it at your own risk.

First Advice: Write down 10 things you want to achieve. Include ideas, expectations, dreams and hopes. Put the list into an envelope and do not open until you are halfway or two-thirds through your Phd period. Remember the things you write down should be seen as advice to your future self. Most probably you will be cynical and jaded to your own advice but take your list seriously when you read it.

Second Advice: If you have the inclination to blog â?? then do so. There are loads of arguments for (here) and against (here) academic blogging. Certain supervisors would view it as a waste of time and energy but I disagree. Any activity which involves the formulation and presentation of ideas is an important activity for a Phd.

Third Advice: Go international. As a Phd you are part of an international community (urgh I am so sick of that word). You may not understand the thesis of a Biochemist is about but you are both struggling with the production of text, supervisors, universities, conferences, journals and much more� Finding people who understand what you do is important. Unless they are also in academia, your friends and family will just think that you never left school and therefore are still immature and naïve.

Fourth Advice: Be helpful and friendly to your colleagues. I have NEVER understood the competitive side of some Phd students who attempt to suppress others. I will never understand the reason why certain people with Phdâ??s tend to forget the reality of the situation and bully Phd students. Picking on people who cannot fight back does not mean you are powerful. It means you are a weak human being.

Fifth Advice: Pick a cartoon. I donâ??t know why. Almost every Phd student I have come across has a cartoon. OK so I have not conducted serious applied empirical studies. The cartoon becomes an icon or a totem. Reading them as metaphysical representations of your daily life adds a new dimension. Calvin & Hobbes work well for this. Piled Higher and Deeper are an obvious choice â?? but that it never a bad thing.

Sixth Advice: Trust no one! Donâ??t believe anything anyone tells you about the Phd. It is an experience. You make the experience. Naturally you are affected by reality but how you choose to accept reality is up to you.

Seventh Advice: Question everything! Conducting research means questioning everything. Its like a return to childhood with the endless naïve questioning of accepted values. Yes it makes you a pain if you have to ask other people questions or tell them your results. But thatâ??s the point. Unquestioned doctrine is dead thought. Even if you arrive at the same conclusion as you did before you began to question then at least you have thought for yourself.

Eighth Advice: Go International 2. Beg, borrow or apply for grants. Travel to conferences and meet people who are smarter than you. Sitting within the confines of your own department is not going to broaden your horizons. You must read and relate to the works of others in your field outside your department if you are to be good at what you do. Relating to your own department may work in the short term.

Ninth Advice: Write! Write! Write! From the day you begin your Phd work. Write! Reading is important but donâ??t get stuck there. Donâ??t wait until you have read â??everythingâ?? or the next important book before starting. If you do not have text you cannot re-write. Keep a research diary if you like â?? this is not a blog â?? in it you write all your research thoughts and ideas. Do not read a book without writing your thoughts about the book (including references to the work and to others). You have no idea how helpful this will be.

Tenth Advice: Enjoy! If you do not enjoy what you do your text will reflect this. If your text reflects this then your thesis will not be interesting for the reader. If you do not enjoy what you do how are you ever going to find the energy to read all the texts, discuss them with others, write all your texts and beg others to discuss them with you?

25 days

Todays total is 84 660. This means today’s count was +831 words. The main focus of todays writing was on autonomy and the effects of censorship – very cool stuff. Today’s recommended reading is Stuart Hamilton’s doctoral dissertation “To what extent can libraries ensure free, equal and unhampered access to Internet-accessible information resources from a global perspective?” (another link here).

In addition to this I gave a lecture entitled “What is eCommerce” which included a list of top ten dot com deaths from Cnet. Founded in the UK as an online fashion store, Boo.com eventually burned through $160 million before crashing in May 2000. I took the picture in London in 2001. Its an sticker I found near Seven Dials. Not a good slogan considering the fate of Boo…

28 days

Sunday and its snowing outside. Todays total for the countdown is +3100 words, which makes a total of 82 900 words or 169 pages). Its 28 days left until I have to hand it all in.
The picture of the day is the Avro Avian IVM biplane.

This plane crashed and was wrecked beyond repair in Cartierville, 1939. From the Aviation History Online Museum. Nice advertising on the airplane.

Todays reading tip: Harris Property and Justice, Oxford University Press. Unfortunately its not online but you can read a review by David Lametti “Property and (Perhaps) Justice” McGill Law Journal.

29 Days

The first day of major re-writing. 29 days left until I have to hand it all in. Result of the day: -2200 words (todays total: 79 800)

Builders
Sternberg – Builders

The main topic of the day was Access. Recommended reading: Ken Worpole & Liz Greenhalgh “The Freedom of the City” (1996).

War is Peace

While reading the Arundhati Roy “The Algebra of Infinite Justice” I came across a list of countries that the United States has bombed and/or invaded since WWII. The list is frighteningly long. Here are a few examples (the dates denote the starting time):

China (1948), Korea (1950), Guatemala (1954), Indonesia (1958), Cuba (1959), The Belgian Congo (1964), Peru (1965), Laos (1964), Vietnam (1961), Cambodia (1969), Grenada (1983), Libya (1986), El Salvador (1980), Nicaragua (1980), Panama (1989), Iraq (1991), Somalia (1992), Bosnia (1995), Yugoslavia (1999), Afghanistan (2001) & Iraq (2003).

Looking around online it is easy to find lots more information. For example “Death Tolls for the Man-made Megadeaths of the 20th Century” and Grossmans “Century of Military Interventions“. While looking through the latter it is difficult to maintain a positive attitude that peace is possible. Must a desire for peace be naive?

169 pages

Its done. The first full length version of my thesis is written. Its late, dark and snowing outside – it couldnt be better. Tommorrow (Saturday) my supervisor will begin reading.