Blogging revisited

In a previous entry I reported reasons why a blogger (especially academic) should blog. Naturally these views are not unanimous. Here is an anonymous submission to the Chronicle of Higher Education signed by the pseudonym Ivan Tribble. Remember the Tribbles from original star trek fame? Small furry, soft, gentle animals whose cute appearance and soothing purring endears them to every sentient race which encounters themâ??with one notable exception: Klingons.

Anyway Ivan Tribble writes about blogs:

â??The pertinent question for bloggers is simply, Why? What is the purpose of broadcasting one’s unfiltered thoughts to the whole wired world? It’s not hard to imagine legitimate, constructive applications for such a forum. But it’s also not hard to find examples of the worst kinds of uses.

A blog easily becomes a therapeutic outlet, a place to vent petty gripes and frustrations stemming from congested traffic, rude sales clerks, or unpleasant national news. It becomes an open diary or confessional booth, where inward thoughts are publicly aired.

Worst of all, for professional academics, it’s a publishing medium with no vetting process, no review board, and no editor. The author is the sole judge of what constitutes publishable material, and the medium allows for instantaneous distribution. After wrapping up a juicy rant at 3 a.m., it only takes a few clicks to put it into global circulation.â??

The more positive approach to blogging mentioned above (Alex Soojung-Kim Pangâ??s If you’ve got a day job…) focused on four reasons to blog: Practice of the skill of writing, gain readers fame & credibility, participate in a discourse and finally market yourself. All these four are important to the academic (and to the blogger).

Tribbleâ??s argument against the blog concern the situation where you are a job applicant and the stuff which you have written online can be used against you. Both when the committee looked at the applicants online appearance â??…it turned out to be every bit as eye-opening as a train wreck.â?? Another aspect which causes blogging concern is the very existence of the blog… â??Several committee members expressed concern that a blogger who joined our staff might air departmental dirty laundry (real or imagined) on the cyber clothesline for the world to see. Past good behavior is no guarantee against future lapses of professional decorum.â??

tribble
Captain Kirk with Tribbles

So basically the blog is like the Tribble – cute, furry and soothing to all (except the Klingons) but remember the problem with Tribbles? The crew of the Starship Enterprise spent so much time cuddling with, and being cuddled by, the Tribbles that they no longer functioned as a crew. In a sense the blog can become like Tribbles. Surrounded by both our own and others we exist in a quasi world of our own creation which is not a bad thing unless we replace the â??realâ?? world with the blogged one.

Digital Divides & Cheap Technology

Nicholas Negroponte has recently been working on developing designs for laptop computer which will retail at under $100 US dollars. The laptop is intended to be a rugged machine and includes ideas like a hand crank which can be used when there is no power supply. http://laptop.media.mit.edu/

To make the machines less sensitive and more durable they ill be encased in rubber and use a flash memory instead of a hard drive to cut down on moving parts. The machines will have a 500MHz processor, four USB ports and WiFi capability. In addition to this the AC adaptor cords will act as carrying straps.

Other project on similar lines include Ndiyo http://www.ndiyo.org/ and the Indian handheld Simputer http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Simputer

The connecting idea between all these ideas is to bring down the price of technology to an affordable level. Once this is done the widespread adoption of ICT in developing nations can begin. This is heralded as the end of the digital divide. While I am all for the bridging of this divide I am not sure that the whole problem is one of economics. It is not enough to provide people with technology they must also have the time and the inclination to use the technology.

I took the test…

The result is Pure Nerd – 73 % Nerd, 39% Geek, 39% Dork

For The Record:
A Nerd is someone who is passionate about learning/being smart/academia.
A Geek is someone who is passionate about some particular area or subject, often an obscure or difficult one.
A Dork is someone who has difficulty with common social expectations/interactions.
You scored better than half in Nerd, earning you the title of: Pure Nerd.

The Nerd? Geek? or Dork? Test

Copyright and Swedish Universities

Some notes from a recent discussion

First lets start off with the fundamental difference between Copyright in Swedish and Anglo/American law. Anglo/American law views copyright as the right to copy or reproduce. Swedish law sees copyright (upphovsrätt roughly translates as the right of origin). This foundamental difference creates problems when attempting to implement or discuss copyright in the different legal regimes.

Those people within universities which may be involved in copyright discussions can be one of three groups of people.

Students
Students can be funded by the university but are not seen as employees for the purpose of copyright. Students however are viewed as â??quasi-employeesâ?? when the discussion of work environment is discussed in the university â?? however this has no bearing on copyright issues.

Therefore the student is not seen as an employee. All/everything produced during his/her period of study belongs to him/her. The university has no copyright in essays, software, artwork or more. This can naturally be changed by contract â?? but then the student must be compensated in some way.

Phd Students (â??selfâ?? funded/funded by the university)
Often viewed as employees. They have the trappings of the employee. Office space, telephone & equipment. However for the discussion of employment relationship the Phd project does not count as work.

The â??selfâ?? employed Phd student is not seen as an employee. All/everything produced during his/her period of study belongs to him/her. The university has no copyright in essays, software, artwork or more. This can naturally be changed by contract â?? but then the student must be compensated in some way. This can be the case of research projects where the Phd student participates.

Phd students funded by the university may be seen as employees. These students are therefore employees who are being paid to produce something for the university. The product belongs to the university (not the moral rights since the moral rights always belong to the author). Traditionally universities in Sweden do not exercise their right to the product. Any attempt to exercise this right must be explicit and based upon contract.

Researchers (â??selfâ?? funded/funded by the university)
The â??selfâ?? employed researcher is not seen as an employee. All/everything produced during his/her period of study belongs to him/her. The university has no copyright in essays, software, artwork or more. This can naturally be changed by contract â?? but then the researcher must be compensated in some way.

Researchers funded by the university may be seen as employees. These researchers are therefore employees who are being paid to produce something for the university. The product belongs to the university (not the moral rights since the moral rights always belong to the author). Traditionally universities in Sweden do not exercise their right to the product. Any attempt to exercise this right must be explicit and based upon contract.

Employees
This group includes all employees who are being paid to produce something for the university. The product belongs to the university (not the moral rights since the moral rights always belong to the author). Traditionally universities in Sweden do not exercise their right to the product. Any attempt to exercise this right must be explicit and based upon contract.

A discussion can naturally be carried out as to what it is that is the employees are being employed to produce.

Additional questions of interest

Access to public information
Any and all material handed in to the university for grading (essays, exams & phd thesisâ??) are considered to be public information. Such public information is available to all who would like to read it (a cost for copying and sending may be levied).

Competing work
Employees at universities have a duty to be loyal and therefore should not carry out work which competes with the goals of the university. This may include abusing positions of trust by producing teaching material which they sell as compulsory material to students. The latter is not prohibited but may be frowned upon.

Autumn Term 2005

Well its official. Summer is finally over and the Autumn (Fall) term is upon us. Sweden only has two terms. This term (besides the usual extra stuff) my main focus is on two courses:

Computer Ethics – This will be a traditional course with lectures in lecture halls (in Göteborg). I am looking forward to this. Course information in Swedish can be found here.

Open Source/Free Sofware: Theory and Philosophy – The course is a distance learning course (in English) which means that it does not have lectures or exams as we are used to. Instead, we have divided the course into one thematic area per week that we read about and discuss. To get the most of the course, we encourage everyone to follow this course plan and participate in the discussions at the same time as fellow students.

Less integrity in Sweden – again!

The Minister of Justice in Sweden wants to allow the police to bug telephones even when no concrete suspicion of crime exists. A proposal to amend the law to allow this will be presented in autumn.

The minister says that this is part of a policy to combat terrorism â?? but he also states that politics is not being formulated by terrorist attacks.

As usual the concern for personal integrity is not high on the political agenda.

Maybe someone should tell him that the whole point of combatting terrorism is to preserve an open society. If we loose this the terrorists are not only dictating policy & politics but actually winning. If European countries such as the UK & Spain remember this in spite of terror attacks then why cannot Sweden (which has not been attacked) be more interested in integrity?

Trademarks & fish

Apparently someone thought it was a good idea to modify a fish so that it glows in the dark…

Naturally the fish is trademarked…

“Bring a miracle of science to your aquarium, and own the hottest, most talked about, most beautiful new fish to come to North America in our lifetime! GloFish� fluorescent fish bring color and excitement to any aquarium� in your home, office, or classroom.”

GloFish ™ – Welcome

On sharks & coconuts

Summer is here and many are heading for the water. I just want to post a small wierd note to comfort those who fear the water.

“Falling coconuts kill 150 people worldwide each year, 15 times the number of fatalities attributable to sharks,” said George Burgess, Director of the University of Florida’s International Shark Attack File and a noted shark researcher.
Daily University Science News 23-May-2002

However the fear of coconuts seems to be exaggerated. Mulford et al (2001) write in the “largest review of coconut-palm related injuries,” that even though extensive studies have been carried out no fatalities have been recorded.

Well despite the academic debate on the topic of which is the most lethal (coconuts or sharks) the best thing to do is to stay away from both of these dangerous pasttimes – why not go bungee jumping instead?

Bibliography
Barss, P. “Injuries due to falling coconuts”, J Trauma. 1984 Nov;24(11):990-1. Read abstract.

Mumford et al, “Coconut Palm-Related Injuries in the Pacific Islands,” Australian and New Zealand Journal of Surgery, Volume 71 Issue 1 Page 32 – January 2001. More info.