We need the GPL

During his keynote speech at FISL (Fórum Internacional de Software Livre) in Brazil, Eric Raymond said, “We don’t need the GPL anymore. It’s based on the belief that open source software is weak and needs to be protected. Open source would be succeeding faster if the GPL didn’t make lots of people nervous about adopting it.” (Quote found here)

The purpose of ther GPL is not to make people accept open source software – the GPL is about Free Software. Open Source software is in a legally and morally weaker position than Free Software. In addition to this the GPL contains within it a fundamental social goal which Open Source does not.

Open source is a method of production – Free Software is creating a social infrastructure which is not the property of anyone and therefore can be used freely by those who need or want it.

EU takes axe to software patents directive | The Register

The European parliament has renewed it opposition to the software patents directive, by making substantial alterations to the draft.

The Financial Times says it has seen a copy of the amended directive, penned by the bill’s rapporteur, Michel Rocard. Under the terms of Rocard’s draft, software would only be patentable if it controlled a physical process, or a controllable force of nature. Patents would not be allowed for software that handles “the treatment, the manipulation, the representation and the presentation of information”.

EU takes axe to software patents directive | The Register

GPL Win in Michigan

The case involved software written in part by Drew Technologies, Inc., to which others contributed, in reliance upon the GPL. DrewTech, an engineering firm in Michigan, develops custom vehicle communications solutions for the automobile industry. DrewTech released the software at issue on SourceForge, under the GNU General Public License (“GPL”).

GROKLAW

Free Software/Open Source: Political Science Course

The deadline for applying to the Free Software/Open Source: Political Science Course has now passed and with almost 200 students from all over the world the course promises to be an exiting example of collaborative distance learning.

Here is the blurb on the course:
The purpose of this course will be to study the effects of technology on the political process by studying how the free software/open source movements organises itself and acts to lobby and affect political decisions in favour for the fundamental messages and ideologies. The course has the intention to help the participant to achieve a greater understanding of the political goals of the free software/open source movements. In addition the course will look at the political and economic conditions for the development of open source and free software.

The course will study the development of politics, policy and law in relation to the role of software in society. Subjects which will be treated in depth are the role of free software/open source in relation to property theory, the politics of technology, community governance and the economic foundations for the assessment of free software/open source development.

First Monday – paper accepted

Free software and open source: The freedom debate and its consequences
– Mathias Klang

“To most outsiders the ethics of software is not something usually considered. To most proficient computer users with a passing interest in this question the ethics of software is recognised as one of the fundamental questions in the digital rights area. To most of the latter, terms such as free software, open source, and their derivatives (FLOSS, FOSS, Software Freedom) are interchangeable. Choosing one over the other is a matter of taste rather than politics.”

First Monday March 2005

Open Source/Free Software: Political science

The purpose of this course will be to study the effects of technology on the political process by studying how the free software/open source movements organises itself and acts to lobby and affect political decisions in favour for the fundamental messages and ideologies. The course has the intention to help the participant to achieve a greater understanding of the political goals of the free software/open source movements. In addition the course will look at the political and economic conditions for the development of open source and free software.

The course will study the development of politics, policy and law in relation to the role of software in society. Subjects which will be treated in depth are the role of free software/open source in relation to property theory, the politics of technology, community governance and the economic foundations for the assessment of free software/open source development.
The course

The course is given as a part time course from April to June (2005). Teaching on the course will be carried out with the help of lectures, readings and group discussions. Examination is carried out through two shorter written assignments and a longer essay (4500 words).

Open Source/Free Software: Political science

Victory for democratic influence on software patents

The Danish Parliament (by the EU Committee) has decided to change the mandate of the Danish government to ensure that on the next meeting in the EU Council the software patent directive will be discussed as a B-item instead of passing as an A-item without any discussion.

Other parliaments have passed resolutions opposing the software patent directive. But Denmark is the first country to call for a B-item and thereby reopening the discussion. If just The Netherlands, Germany, Poland, and Spain backs the Danish request, there will not be a qualified majority in favor of passing the directive without discussion.

“This is a victory for the democratic process in the European Union. Both in Denmark and the rest of Europe there have been a tremendous interest in this issue.- IT-Political Association is ecstatic now that there is a very good chance that the all the citizens in Europe will have a chance to participate in the discussion of the directive,” Ole Tange, board member in IT-Political Association says. “We do not view this as a failure for the proponents of the directive; if their arguments are valid they would still have been valid after a democratic discussion. Though so far we have not seen valid arguments.”

Niels Elgaard Larsen, Anne Østergaard, and Ole Tange from IT-pol.dk spoke to the EU Committee in Folketinget.dk as part of a delegation also counting Peter Ussing from PROSA.dk and Peter Mogensen from
Digitalforbruger.dk

Software patents: EU votes for restart

The European Parliament’s committee on Legal Affairs (JURI) has voted overwhelmingly in favour of a restart of the whole legislative process of the controversial directive on computer implemented inventions. The result of the vote is a huge boost to anti-patent campaigners, who are concerned that the directive would allow patents to be granted on pure software inventions, as they are in the US.

Software patents: EU votes for restart | The Register

European software patent law hangs in the balance | The Register

The fate of the European software patent directive is set to be decided next week, as its supporters and its opponents head to a final showdown in Brussels.

In the red corner, we have the Council of Ministers, the authors, and long-time supporters, of the current draft. In the blue corner, we have the European Parliament, an increasingly powerful institution, determined to send the bill back to the drawing board. The battle to be fought involves some extraordinarily dull parliamentary procedural rules, so don’t expect it to be pretty.

European software patent law hangs in the balance | The Register